MNCT 617 - Investment vs. Involvement
“If you realize that all things change, there is nothing you will try to hold on to. If you aren’t afraid of dying, there is nothing you can’t achieve.”
-Lao Tzu
Last weekend, I was chatting with the extraordinary therapist/philosopher George Pransky (www.pandacc.com) when he shared a distinction that gave me a whole new understanding of the dynamic underlying not only my frustration with certain world events but also the effectiveness of my own “Effortless Success” programs.
In order to share the distinction with you, I’d like you to imagine there are two separate elements involved in creating anything we want.
The first is an emotional investment - the extent to which we put our happiness, self-worth and well-being on the line in our pursuit of an outcome.
The second is mental and physical involvement - the extent to which we put our creative and physical energies into the creation of that outcome.
There are essentially four ways in which these elements can combine in relation to any goal, problem or circumstance you can imagine in the world.
1. Low Investment/Low Involvement
Low investment/Low involvement is when you don’t particularly care (or even know) about what happens and you are doing pretty much nothing to influence the outcome in any way.
Someone who doesn’t care about sport will be unaffected by the outcome of a sporting match. Someone who has no interest in a relationship, job or world situation will not only not care how those things are going, they will do little or nothing to attempt to influence how things go in the future.
On the plus side, low investment/low involvement is an extremely low stress and relatively easy way to be; the down side is you both miss out on both the fun of creation and the potential impact you could be having in your life and in the world.
2. High Investment/Low Involvement
One of the few fist fights I have ever found myself in came when I misguidedly suggested to a football fan that his team’s loss that day to their cross-city rivals did not really merit the amount of moral outrage he was expressing in the pub that night. This is, in fact, every fan’s dilemma - their moods rise and fall with their team’s fortunes yet outside of cheering loudly and the occasional fervent prayer, there’s nothing they can do to affect the outcome.
This is the high investment/low involvement dilemma - you care too much and do too little. While in some situations this is necessitated by circumstance (i.e. it’s unlikely your favorite team will ever let you out onto the field to make the game winning play), the lack of action is more often due to learned helplessness and emotional paralysis - it seems as though there is so much to be done that you wind up feeling overwhelmed and doing nothing.
3. High Investment/High Involvement
Graduates of motivational seminars, social and political activists, and high-flying entrepreneurs and careerists tend to pursue their goals from a high investment/high involvement point of view. They work long hours, take massive action, do whatever it takes, and then ride the emotional rollercoaster up through the thrill of victory and down into the agony of defeat.
One minute they’re on top of the world; the next their down in the pits of despair. In fact, how well they’re doing often comes down not so much with whether you happen to catch them in an up or a down than with how long they’ve been riding the coaster.
For while this can be an effective approach in the short-term, it often leads to the burn-out/drop-out mentality that stops so many people from actually reaching their goals, and in many people an actual fear of setting goals.
“Oh, no - I’m not putting myself through *that* again” the former eco-warrior or bankrupted businessman will say. Yet lowering your involvement (i.e. doing less, dropping out, not playing anymore, etc.) will not ultimately resolve your desire for change. It will simply give you a bit of time to lick your wounds and recover your spirit before throwing yourself back into the arena in the only way you know how.
4. Low Investment/High Involvement
The two best ways I know to lower your level of emotional investment in an outcome are:
a. Get as clear as you can about what is within your control and what is not.
b. Really see that you will be OK regardless of what happens and how things turn out - that your ultimate happiness and well-being is not at stake.
Years ago, I decided to see what would happen if I engaged in an act of “happy activism” - that is, I would do anything I could think of to get our local council to put a crosswalk in at the intersection near our house, but I would completely let myself off the hook for how things turned out, which I recognized lay well outside of the sphere of my control. While the process wound up taking over a year, to my surprise the entire project was low-stress, extremely enjoyable, and as it happened resulted in a crosswalk.
This is the real pay-off of a low investment/high involvement/”effortless success” approach - you get all the fun of being creatively engaged without any of the stress of being emotionally invested. It’s completely sustainable because it’s not dependant on continual emotional refueling to keep you going. And by letting go of trying to control the uncontrollable (i.e. what other people will do and how things ultimately turn out), you ironically increase your influence and the probability of getting what you want.
——————–
Today’s Experiment:
——————–
1. Make a list of the significant projects, goals or problems you are facing in your life right now.
2. On a scale from 1 - 10, rank yourself for investment (how miserable will you be if this doesn’t work out?) and involvement (how much creativity, engagement and action are you bringing to creating things the way you want them to be?).
3. Choose one project or goal to deliberately take a low-investment/high-involvement approach to and notice what you notice.
Have fun, learn heaps, and happy experimenting!
With love,
Michael



